RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Extensions position paper draft

["Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>]

All of this work is done by "just us chickens", so I don't want to stand on 
ceremony too much.  I agree that it's a good idea to ensure that the 
context work get general agreement by the full NDR group, but I would have 
assumed that to be a good idea anyway, even for the stuff that's 
uncontroversially 100% in the CMSC bailiwick anyway.

Let's definitely consider the December 19 meeting a joint SC meeting, but 
we've only got 60 minutes, so let's be careful how we spend it.

         Eve

At 10:14 AM 12/6/01 -0800, Gregory, Arofan wrote:
>Matt:
>
>I'm a little concerned that we get concensus from the design team on this, 
>since it drives so many other decisions about modularity, which features 
>of schema are to be used, namespaces & versioning, etc. I think we have 
>too many teams working on the same thing at the same time to be splitting 
>work up in an uncoordinated fashion, so we need to be really careful to 
>stay aligned, even with the overlap in membership. Perhaps after the 
>discussion next week - assuming we get agreement within the design team - 
>we could then pass it off, but I do think we want to be careful about this.

--
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com