[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] Account Response and Application Response.
i am not proposing deleting anything. I am pointing out we have
duplication. The Danish Govt proposed Account Response as a means of notifying the Seller Party that the Buyer had received the Invoice and would be processing it. The Catalogue group proposed the Application Response as a generic means of notifying a party about acceptance or not (at an application level) of any documents. For example, the Seller notifying the Buyer that they have received a Request for Catalogue and would be processing it. (Is this the one that looks like a 824? - it was based on EDIFACT APERAK) Personally I think it very confusing to have both documents. We should be able to rationalize these and have one document that satisfies both requirements. If we agree with this, then the issue is what should it look like. Sylvia Webb wrote:
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services http://www.docengineering.com/ |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]