[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-security] Re: UBL Profile for XML Digital Signatures and XAdES implementation
Hello,
Please disregard my vote for the SC. I am fine
with either of the proposed co-chairs and am not nominating
myself.
Pim From: JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino [mailto:roberto@javest.com] Sent: 24 November 2009 13:44 To: Julián Inza Cc: ubl-security@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Tim McGrath'; 'G. Ken Holman'; 'Jon Bosak'; 'Andrea Caccia' Subject: [ubl-security] Re: UBL Profile for XML Digital Signatures and XAdES implementation --- Julián Inza ha scritto: We just need to verify this is a correct way as the above reference is made between an URI element and an attribute ID, also this is requiring a specific awarness into software. These are alternatives, and I proposed the 1st as it is comparing an ID with another ID (not an URI). However the 2nd, based on xpointer, is not complex and is using XML notations that can be better supported by software and reference implementations of XML technologies. The xpointer(...) syntax contains exactly the XPath to unambiguously identify the location of the enveloped signature. I would choose the 2nd, and the 1st, if used, should be consistent by using the same ID. I think UBL TC members could better help on deciding xml related issues. It is just to play XML in the right way, or however to avoid requiring too specific coding by adopters. I leave this to other experts
Thanks Roberto Cisternino
--
JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino * Document Engineering Services Ltd. - Alliance Member * UBL Italian Localization SubCommittee (ITLSC), co-Chair * UBL Online Community editorial board member (ubl.xml.org) * Italian UBL Advisor Roberto Cisternino
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]