[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-tsc] Re: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 7 August 2012
Ok then I am fine with this proposal. On 8/08/12 11:03 PM, Jon Bosak wrote:
Tim McGrath wrote:> If I recall the original idea we had was that 'transportation' meant the > overall concept of transporting goods. 'Transport' was reserved for the> verb 'to transport'. As in, "I transport goods using a transportation > service". But i agree this is a probably an unnecessary distinction if > it causes too much confusion. > > So are we trying to settle on 'Transport' or 'Transportation'? Doesn't > this proposal just swap the terms around? No. See https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-tsc/201207/msg00012.html for an explanation. Briefly, the proposal is to use "Transport" wherever possible, the only exceptions being TransportationService and TransportationStatus, which we're stuck with from 2.0. Jon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-tsc-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-tsc-help@lists.oasis-open.org
begin:vcard fn:Tim McGrath n:McGrath;Tim org:Document Engineering Services email;internet:tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com title:Managing Director tel;work:+61893352228 tel;home:+61438352228 tel;cell:+61438352228 url:www.documentengineeringservices.com version:2.1 end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]