RE: [ubl] Cross-list posting: Proposed amended RT Schema

["CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

Stephen,

 

We changed the RT/DT relationship last month.  The rules are in rewrite, but essentially there is no RT schema module - it is replaced by an unqualified data type schema module.  The UBL DT's are expressed in a qualified data type schema module.  The reason for the change is that the RT schema module is unnecessary and duplicative of unqualified DTs.

 

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:43 PM
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl] Cross-list posting: Proposed amended RT Schema

It was discussed in LCSC, TTSC and NDRSC that

we will probably need to fall back to our current

beta and pre-beta draft codelists position. To that end,

though it wasn't an action item given to me but rather

an acknowledged job-to-be-done, I've made the small 

adjustments to the Representation Terms Schema.

Although we seem to be calling it a CC Datatypes

Schema, I could find no NDR Rule to that effect

(only the rule in the last published - 16th Jan 2004 -

set of rules and previously published checklist stating

that it is to be called the CCTS:RepresentationTerm

Schema Module with prefix rt:).

 

Please find the same attached

 

Stephen Green