OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl] NDR checklist

Congratulations to those involved in this checklist - I'm reading through
it and it looks very good.

There are a few matters:

CTN3:   typo:  it should read "...a ccts:UnspecializedDatatype.." but the
'a' and 'cct' run
 together and 'cct' should be 'ccts'
CTN4:   typo:  has a 'cct:' which should be 'ccts:'
(I point these out because they could confuse since cct: is an actual UBL
Schema prefix)

ELD1:  still has 'ControlSchema' which should be 'DocumentSchema' (many will
not know what a 'control schema' is since it doesn't get used as a term
elsewhere in UBL whereas 'document schema' does e.g. here in GXS10)

ELNx: still has an editorial comment '(?)' I think  and should it be 'ELNx'?

SSM16 still refers to CLUDT and this is still mandated in SSM17 and SSM19
but is this an open issue still for after 1.0? If so perhaps a note should
be added
to that effect (as has been done with ATD6)

Sorry if I'm too late with the above

All the best


----- Original Message -----
From: <jon.bosak@sun.com>
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:55 AM
Subject: [ubl] NDR checklist

> Attached is the NDR checklist as I have it ready to include in the
> CD build.  It includes the language suggested by Mike Grimley
> for ELD4 (modulo a couple of tiny editorial adjustments) in
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200404/msg00016.html
> and the Appendix B (here presented as front matter) per
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200404/msg00019.html
> It also includes the language for ATD6 proposed at
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200404/msg00188.html
> I'm operating on the assumption that this list has been reviewed
> per the procedure specified at
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200404/msg00012.html
> and that all members of the TC agree that the schemas in the last
> build conform in every way to the rules in this checklist.  If
> anyone knows differently, now is the time to speak up.
> I'm still hoping to have an answer to my question at
>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200404/msg00187.html
> in time for the next build.
> Jon


> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]