[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Candidate approach for W3C Schema with wild cards for code list value validation
[gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com:] | I do not *like* replacing placebo files with other definitions and | would rather work with the XSD files untouched, but it would seem | W3C Schema technology does not allow that import flexibility. | | I will now focus my time on Schematron since W3C Schema is holding | me back. If we can make two-pass validation that includes a Schematron check as easy for the user as a one-pass XSD validation, then I don't see any value in providing all the code lists as XSD schemas anyway. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]