Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

[Mark Leitch <ml@tritorr.com>]

Title: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

I just want to see consistency in approach.  Either all lines should have a Line Status Code or none should.

M

Mark Leitch
Director - Tritorr Ltd
Tel.:   +44 1932 821112
Cell.:  +44 7881 822999
Mail:   ml@tritorr.com
Site:   www.tritorr.com





> From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:06:03 +0100
> To: <mhb@itst.dk>, <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode
> 
> What if I can remember there was lots of discussion to add Line Status Code
> but can't remember all of it and don't have time to go back to all the emails,
> etc concerning it?
> 
> What if we did this to every BIE we didn't personally understand?
> 
>>>> Mikkel Hippe Brun <mhb@itst.dk> 26/10/05 14:58:29 >>>
> 
> ...
> 
> In my opinion LineStatusCode should be removed if someone cannot come up
> with a good explanation and business case for its use.
> 
> - Regards Mikkel
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
>