Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

[Mark Leitch <ml@tritorr.com>]

Title: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

The inconsistency crosses the 1.0 document lines and the extended document lines.

M
Mark Leitch
Director - Tritorr Ltd
Tel.:   +44 1932 821112
Cell.:  +44 7881 822999
Mail:   ml@tritorr.com
Site:   www.tritorr.com





> From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:38:10 +0100
> To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode
> 
> Mark
> 
> If you were to put this to a vote in PSC I'd vote against changing it - with 
> the reasons:
> 1. it would take too long (not enough time available) to go back over this now
> 2. this is a core part of the UBL procurement documents
> 3. just saying it looks inconsistent isn't, to my view, enough
>  - generally inconsistencies appear to be so at first glance but looking into 
> it further with the original reasoning often reveals good reasons why 
> something is so - that's my experience in UBL anyway (after all there have 
> been things to consider such as alignment with EDI standards which do have 
> some peculiarities - but sometimes for good reason and usually with an 
> investment of implemenation to consider).
> 4 - the rule is to avoid semantic changes where possible and that would 
> especially apply to deletions
> 
> All the best
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
>>>> Mark Leitch <ml@tritorr.com> 26/10/05 16:21:21 >>>
> I just want to see consistency in approach.  Either all lines should have a
> Line Status Code or none should.
> 
> M
> 
> Mark Leitch
> Director - Tritorr Ltd
> Tel.:   +44 1932 821112
> Cell.:  +44 7881 822999
> Mail:   ml@tritorr.com 
> Site:   www.tritorr.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:06:03 +0100
>> To: <mhb@itst.dk>, <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
>> Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode
>> 
>> What if I can remember there was lots of discussion to add Line Status Code
>> but can't remember all of it and don't have time to go back to all the 
>> emails,
>> etc concerning it?
>> 
>> What if we did this to every BIE we didn't personally understand?
>> 
>>>>> Mikkel Hippe Brun <mhb@itst.dk> 26/10/05 14:58:29 >>>
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> In my opinion LineStatusCode should be removed if someone cannot come up
>> with a good explanation and business case for its use.
>> 
>> - Regards Mikkel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>> at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
>