ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem
- From: Mark Leitch <ml@tritorr.com>
- To: Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>,<ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:20:33 +0000
Title: Re: SV: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem
Stephen
There may still be a few changes to the model. Hopefully this will be cleared this week.
Regards, Mark
Mark Leitch
From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:35:36 +0000
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem
Hi Peter,
Thanks for clarifying this. Will there be changes to the model apart
from the defintions though? If not the SBS work could perhaps begin.
All the best
Steve
>>> Peter Larsen Borresen <plb@itst.dk> 28/11/05 11:32:25 >>>
Hi Stephen
I just want to make clear that my recently generated schemas was for the use
of the Procument group only (and Betty). Mark is about to review the
definitions for the ABIE's and the schemas will not be released to the list
before this is done. Therefore I saw no reason for including documentation
with the schemas.
Kind regards
Peter
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk]
Sendt: 25. november 2005 12:47
Til: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: ubl-ssc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: [ubl] CCP Schema Action Item: Fwd: [ubl] Altova problem
Greetings
My action item was to look into how to fix the Core Components Parameters
Schema
problem. Attached is the original report from Altova identifying the problem
and it does
indicate that the missing Defintion elements in UBL 1.0 were in the codelist
schema CCTS
metadata documentation areas. The 2.0 spreadsheets do contain the Definition
data
so the solution appears to be to ensure that the data is included by the
generator in the
2.0 codelist schemas as populated Defintion elements. Peter's recently
mailed schemas
did not include documentation (xsdrt schemas) so I couldn't check whether
the
generator does this already. I notice, though, that the schemas Peter sent
do import the
CCP schemas and the Atlantic meeting this week seemed to conclude that this
has to be
changed too.
To summarise:
The generator tool should
1. ensure that the ccts:Definition elements are included in all the schemas
(including the
codelist schemas) in 2.0 - the data should be found in the QDT spreadsheet
2. no longer import the CCP schema into the other UBL schemas but still
include the
CCP schema in the output package (updated CCP schema attached).
All the best
Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]