[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Understanding code list declarations
Will there be a corresponding set of schema expressions with the end-of-February support package? This is a good question. Maybe it should be added to the agenda for discussion on Wednesday. Unfortunately, I will not be available on Wednesday to participate on the call, but from a FX viewpoint, updated schema can be generated quickly if there are updated spreadsheets. Regards, Sylvia -----Original Message----- From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com] Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 7:27 AM To: Universal Business Language Subject: RE: [ubl] Understanding code list declarations At 2006-02-10 21:15 -0800, Sylvia Webb wrote: >IMO, the simple type unconstrained CurrencyCodeType is an error due to >previously reported missing and inconsistent information in the hand >crafted spreadsheets for code lists that were imported Fine .... >I believe there is an action item to correct the hand crafted >spreadsheets for the next schema generation. My processes are all triggered on the schema expressions, so I could change all references that are to CurrencyCodeType (the simpleType) to be CurrencyCodeContentType (the complexType) in my local copy of the schema expressions, but then the work that I produce wouldn't match the working draft 2.0 schemas that are out there today. >Once the spreadsheets are accurate, EDIFIX will create the correct data >models and auto generate the correct CBC schema module with complex >types for all identified CodeTypes with the corresponding constraints. Fine .... I do not need *finalized* schemas but are there more up-to-date draft schemas with which I can do my code list work? We have been tasked with producing a new package of support deliverables for the end of February. Will there be a corresponding set of schema expressions with the end-of-February support package? I am designing my systems so that I can recreate my outputs from any set of schema expression inputs, be they hand-edited by me to remove the inconsistencies, or generated by software with the fixes. I am automating as much as I can, but the processes need tender ministrations to get from start to finish. What should I do for the end of February support package? My gut feel is to publish my work *with* the inconsistency since that is consistent with the schema files that have been published. I will proceed in this fashion unless people feel strongly otherwise. Thanks, Sylvia! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO hands-on courses: Washington,DC 2006-03-13/17 World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training. G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]