Re: [ubl] Default letter ballot: creating the UBL Security SC

[Jon Bosak <bosak@pinax.com>]

Peter L. Borresen wrote:
> I would like to appoint that there is a similar project going on
> in UN/CEFACT TBG6. If we form a group like this I will suggest
> that it coordinates its work with this group so we do not
> diverse too much with UN/CEFACT. I wrote the original BRS for
> this group. I would also like to stress that we in UBL2 have a
> signature class and that requirements must be putted forward to
> the PCS in order to update this with new requirements.

We purposely left open the liaisons to be formed by the
subcommittee.  It appears that there is good reason to liaise with
TBG6 on this issue, and it's possible that some exploratory
discussion of this may begin next week in Rome if arrangements can
be made in time.

Jon