[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Ad-hoc meeting re: ANS status for UBL 2.1
All, some comment on standardization in EU. Il giorno 11/apr/2013, alle ore 06:47, Roberto ha scritto: > Hello Ken, > > I comment the following point: > >> not wise to go to only one national body, should we also be going to, >> say, the Northern European countries for additional acceptance? > > About National Bodies in Europe (ESOs - European Standard Organizations) there is a recent *special* white paper to facilitate the endorsment (acceptance) of open standards. > In few words if an ESO recognise UBL as Standard the effect will be that UBL will be considered Standard in the whole Europe. > > This is the official white paper: > http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52009DC0324:EN:NOT This is just a white paper, it has no legal value but started a process that led to the production of a EU Regulation on standardization: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:316:0012:0033:EN:PDF Here follows the parts that IMO can be of interest. Fron whereas (6): "Furthermore the Union should encourage contact between European standardisation organisations and private forums and consortia, while maintaining the primacy of European standardisation." From CHAPTER IV - ICT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS: "Article 13 - Identification of ICT technical specifications eligible for referencing 1. Either on proposal from a Member State or on its own initiative the Commission may decide to identify ICT technical specifications that are not national, European or international standards, but meet the requirements set out in Annex II, which may be referenced, primarily to enable interoperability, in public procurement. 2. Either on proposal from a Member State or on its own initiative, when an ICT technical specification identified in accordance with paragraph 1 is modified, withdrawn or no longer meets the requirements set out in Annex II, the Commission may decide to identify the modified ICT technical specification or to withdraw the identification. 3. The decisions provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be adopted after consultation of the European multi-stakeholder platform on ICT standardisation, which includes European stan- dardisation organisations, Member States and relevant stake holders, and after consultation of the committee set up by the corresponding Union legislation, if it exists, or after other forms of consultation of sectoral experts, if such a committee does not exist. Article 14 - Use of ICT technical specifications in public procurement The ICT technical specifications referred to in Article 13 of this Regulation shall constitute common technical specifications referred to in Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC, and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002." A Regulation is similar to a Directive but is in force immediately without a transposition and automatically repelling any national law in contrast with it (with the only exception of each Member State Constitution). This particular Regulation is in force since January 1st, 2013 in all EU member states. > > This is a recent appreciation by OASIS that I think it is related: > https://www.oasis-open.org/news/pr/eu-reform This indeed refers to the new Regulation I mentioned. BTW the ESO that surely is more involved in eBusiness in CEN, in fact the article reads: "CEN has embraced and facilitated the broad use of OASIS standards including the Universal Business Language (UBL) for public procurement across Europe" is true but no formal TC exists today in CEN on this matter. Currently in CEN the only official table open is the "eBusiness Coordination Group": http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/Sectors/ISSS/eBusinness/Pages/default.aspx and: http://www.ebusinesscg.eu/ I'd like to add that the CEN Workshops Agreements (CWAs) are indeed important but formally are not European standards, in fact (from the CEN site): "The CEN/CENELEC Workshop Agreement is a technical agreement, developed by an open workshop structure within the framework of CEN/CENELEC and owned by CEN/CENELEC as a publication, which reflects the consensus of only the registered participants responsible for its contents. The Workshop Agreement therefore does not represent the level of consensus and transparency required for a European Standard (EN) and is not designed to support legislative requirements". Hope it helps… Andrea
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]