[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-11) Revision Methodology as a Committee Note
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58954#comment-58954 ] Ken Holman commented on UBL-11: ------------------------------- Now in the hands of TC Admin for processing: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TCADMIN-2085 Note that I was mislead by https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tc-admin-requests/committee-note-ballot-request where it states a special majority vote (on Kavi) is to be requested. In fact, https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#standApprovProcess states that only a full majority vote (during a meeting) is required. TC Admin is processing our voting and request as the equivalent to an approval. > Revision Methodology as a Committee Note > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: UBL-11 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-11 > Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Future tasks for consideration > Reporter: Ken Holman > Assignee: Ken Holman > > Create a Committee Note documenting for those inside and outside of the committee the process the committee will use to solicit and incorporate candidates for inclusion in a revision of UBL. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]