Re: Requesting ballots for #31 and #32

[Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:04:35PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:38:13AM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'd like to request ballots for the following issues:
> > 
> > "content: reserve virtio device ID for file system devices"
> > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/31
> > 
> > "virtio-blk: discard and write zeroes clarifications"
> > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/32
> > 
> > At least #32 is needed for VIRTIO 1.1 but #31 is trivial and will
> > prevent device ID conflicts so I suggest merging it too.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Stefan
> 
> Would you say that #32 is a material change or not?
> 
> 	"Material Change" is any change to the content of a Work Product that
> 	that would require a compliant application or implementation to be
> 	modified or rewritten in order to remain compliant or which adds new
> 	features or otherwise expands the scope of the work product.
> 
> I think you indicated in the past that it isn't.
> 
> However I think #31 would be a new feature. If yes including it would not
> qualify as non material change and that would force
> another public review round.
> 
> Would you agree?
> If doesn't seem worth forcing a public review for a trivial change.

Yes, I agree on both counts.

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature