WAS Core 0.2 Draft 1

["Mark Curphey" <mark@curphey.com>]

I didn't see any debate about the initial WAS Core 0.2 on the mailing
list....did I miss anything ? IS everyone happy with at least the concept.

If not I will proceed and integrate the Thesaurus and tighten up the schema
itself significantly before Thursdays meeting.

Are there any elements or attributes missing at this stage in the Meta-Data
?

Has anyone had any more thoughts about the amount or type of processing
needed to describe the actual tests? What is missing from VulnXML that would
be needed ?

Mark

Everyone sure is quiet on this list ;-)