[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan
Yes, that's what I thought and I don't think Oracle would be alone in this. I'm also not sure whether any OASIS policies on privacy of TC work would prevent such relatively public displays of code. Mark. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simeon M Greene" <simeon.m.greene@oracle.com> To: "John Fuller" <jfuller@wernervas.com>; "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> Cc: <ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org>; <ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org>; "malik saheb" <malik.saheb@arjuna.com>; <krishna@inventicasystems.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:39 PM Subject: RE: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan > Unfortunately, policies here at Oracle will prevent me from loading source > code up on sourceforge. Most likely I will have to keep my source code > private until the legal department clears it for release. Usually that > happens after the code has reached some point of stability (like after the > demos are completed). > If we follow what the WS-I Sample Application Implementation group does, > each company would develop their own implementation in private, but > following a specification and testing against established test cases. We do > however need a common repository for WSDL files, specs, test cases etc... > Maybe we can use sourceforge/cvs for that. > > -Simeon > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Fuller [mailto:jfuller@wernervas.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:38 AM > To: Mark Little > Cc: ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org; > ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org; malik saheb; > krishna@inventicasystems.com > Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan > > > I guess as my suggestion goes, I was imagining someone like Malik could > set up a sourceforge project > (and sourceforge.net would be the host) sort of like I did at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/easywsrm/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/easyasap/ > and Jeffrey Ricker did at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/axisasap/ > and grant developers administrative permissions. > > It's free, public, you can move whatever you want into the file > releases if you have administrative rights, etc. So I could move in > C++ for that package, others could move in their Java and we could also > put our working documents out there. It does support CVS, but you > don't need to use it. > > *** > > Another alternative I suppose would be a yahoo group like boost C++ > uses for its files at > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/ > This would make the work public just to those in the group. > > > On Dec 17, 2003, at 2:25 AM, Mark Little wrote: > > > It's worth considering, but who'd host it? > > > > Also, are we actually going to provide a single demo implementation (or > > implementations depending on the coding language) or just a > > model/definition > > that each individual member can code against? There are pros and cons > > of > > both approaches. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]