[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Issue 120 - WS-Discovery - References update
Following are the additional reference updates for WS-Discovery
and my analysis on spec impact. From: [IANA] Port
Numbers, http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers,
February 2005. To: [IANA] Port Numbers, http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers,
December 2008. Spec Impact: None From: [Namespaces in XML 1.1] W3C Recommendation, Namespaces in XML 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names11-20040204/, 4 February 2004. To: [Namespaces in
XML 1.1] W3C Recommendation, Namespaces in
XML 1.1 (Second Edition), http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816/, 16 August 2006. Spec Impact: None From: [RFC 2253] M.
Wahl, et al, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String
Representation of Distinguished Names, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2253.txt,
IETF RFC 2253, December 1997. [RFC
2255] T.
Howes, et al, The LDAP URL Format, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2255.txt,
IETF RFC 2255, December 1997. To: [RFC 4514] Zeilenga,
K., Ed., Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation
of Distinguished Names, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4514.txt,
IETF RFC 4514, June 2006. [RFC 4516] Smith,
M., Ed. and T. Howes, Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4516.txt,
IETF RFC 4516, June 2006. Spec Impact: Change in the Section 5.1 as
follows: Current Text http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-dd/discovery/2008/09/ldap Using a case-insensitive
comparison, the scheme of S1 and S2 is "ldap" and the hostport [RFC 2255] of S1 and S2 is the same and the RDNSequence [RFC 2253] of the dn of S1 is a prefix of the RDNSequence of
the dn of S2, where comparison does not support the variants in an RDNSequence
described in Section 4 of RFC 2253 [RFC 2253]. Modified Text http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-dd/discovery/2008/09/ldap Using a case-insensitive
comparison, the scheme of S1 and
S2 is "ldap" and the host
and port [RFC 3986] of S1 and S2
are the same and the RDNSequence
[RFC 4514] of dn [RFC 4516] of
S1 is a prefix of the RDNSequence
[RFC 4514] of dn [RFC 4516] of
S2. From: [XML Schema,
Part 1] W3C
Recommendation, XML Schema Part 1: Structures, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/,
2 May 2001. To: [XML Schema, Part 1] W3C Recommendation, XML
Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/,
28 October 2004 Spec Impact: None From: [XML Schema,
Part 2] W3C Recommendation, XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/,
02 May 2001. To: [XML Schema, Part 2] W3C
Recommendation, XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/,
28 October 2004. Spec Impact: None From: Ram Jeyaraman
[mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com] This issue is assigned the number 120. For further
discussions on this issue, please refer to this issue number or use this
thread. Suggested updates to WS-Discovery: 1. WS-Security A.
Nadalin, et al, "Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security V1.0,"
March 2004. To 2. WS-Trust, WS-SecureConversation
refs need to be updated in February once the v1.4 of the respective specs are
ratified as OASIS standards. This is expected to happen on Feb 1, 2009. 3. Update copyright year in footer
and copyright section to 2009. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]