ws-dd message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-dd] Results of poll on face-to-face meeting attendance andpreferences
- From: Mike Kaiser <mkaiser@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-dd@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:59:07 -0400
Toby and Alain,
I think the data suggests it should
be held in Irvine and not Redmond. I favor this position based on
the number of companies attending.
The vote (plus Elmar's input) indicates
the following:
For
Redmond 3 companies would be in attendance.
For
Irvine 4 companies would be in attendance.
In both cases the same number of companies
would be present (either by teleconference or by attendance). So,
tie goes to the one which has the most companies in attendance.
Thanks,
Mike
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
Phone: 919-254-7605 T/L 444-7605
From:
| "Alain Regnier" <alain@ricoh-tech.com>
|
To:
| "Toby Nixon" <Toby.Nixon@microsoft.com>,
<ws-dd@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 06/09/2009 08:41 AM
|
Subject:
| RE: [ws-dd] Results of poll on face-to-face
meeting attendance and preferences |
In addition to the numbers below, Elmar said
he could also attend in person in Redmond or Irvine.
(the 3 ballots regarding the location of
the meeting do not include a response from him)
Alain
From: Toby Nixon [mailto:Toby.Nixon@microsoft.com]
Sent: Mon 6/8/2009 11:57 AM
To: ws-dd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-dd] Results of poll on face-to-face meeting attendance
and preferences
The ballots regarding the proposed face-to-face
meeting in July concluded last Friday evening.
We currently have 14 voting TC members, so
we need 8 attendees to have a quorum to conduct business at a meeting.
Of the 14 voting members, 9 voted on the
ballots, plus 2 members who are not currently voting members, for a total
of 11 votes.
The results of the ballots were as follows:
For each location, would you attend in person,
participate by teleconference, or not participate:
Rostock: Attend in person 2, participate
by teleconference 2, not participate 7
Irvine: Attend in person 3, participate
by teleconference 5, not participate 3
Redmond: Attend in person 6, participate
by teleconference 4, not participate 1
On the fourth ballot, regarding preference
between the locations, the voting was Rostock 3, Irvine 3, Redmond 4.
From this, I conclude that we would not achieve
quorum in Rostock. We would not have a quorum present in person in either
Irvine or Redmond, but when including participation by teleconference,
we would have quorum in Irvine (8) or Redmond (10). The location preference
is Redmond (by one vote).
The proposal is thus to have the face-to-face
meeting in Redmond, July 14-16.
Any thoughts or discussion on this? Should
we go ahead with this plan, so that those who plan to attend in person
can make travel arrangements and the hosts can make logistical arrangements?
Will we have critical mass at the meeting to make some decisions and move
the work forward?
-- Toby
Toby Nixon | Senior
Standards Program Manager | Windows Device and Storage Technologies
| Microsoft Corporation
toby.nixon@microsoft.com
| www.microsoft.com
| V: +1 425 706 2792 | M: +1 206 790 6377 | F:
+1 425 708 4811
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]