RE: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

["Mary McRae" <marypmcrae@gmail.com>]

Hi Gilbert,

 

  This was certainly never the intent of the TC Process. Some TCs maintain their specs in XHTML and don't use a word-processing app at all, but if the TC prefers to use OpenOffice or some other ODF app to author/edit then it doesn't need to be overly concerned with the HTML output.

 

Regards,

 

Mary

---

From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:30 PM
To: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

As far as I know, it is. Editing is going to be more painful from this point on because we need to maintain parallel OpenDoc and HTML versions of the spec. :-( This sucks, but it was the only way to produce a readable HTML version.

 

- gp

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:37 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

was thinking about applying some of the resolved PR issues to the spec but before I did I wanted to make sure I extracted the right/latest versions.  Am I correct in assuming that the stuff in the CD4 folder is the latest?
-Doug