RE: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

["Gilbert Pilz" <gpilz@bea.com>]

Mary,

 

While I appreciate your attempt to let us off the hook on this, some of the members of the WS-RX TC have been very vocal about the quaility of the HTML versions. Pending any changes to their stance on the matter, it seems we will just have to do the extra work.

 

- gp

---

From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:38 AM
To: Gilbert Pilz; 'Doug Davis'; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

Hi Gilbert,

 

  This was certainly never the intent of the TC Process. Some TCs maintain their specs in XHTML and don't use a word-processing app at all, but if the TC prefers to use OpenOffice or some other ODF app to author/edit then it doesn't need to be overly concerned with the HTML output.

 

Regards,

 

Mary

---

From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:30 PM
To: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

As far as I know, it is. Editing is going to be more painful from this point on because we need to maintain parallel OpenDoc and HTML versions of the spec. :-( This sucks, but it was the only way to produce a readable HTML version.

 

- gp

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:37 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] latest docs

was thinking about applying some of the resolved PR issues to the spec but before I did I wanted to make sure I extracted the right/latest versions.  Am I correct in assuming that the stuff in the CD4 folder is the latest?
-Doug