RE: Approved Errata for WS-RM specifications (of WS-RX TC)

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Title: Approved Errata for WS-RM specifications (of WS-RX TC)

Hi Sanjay,

 

  Once approved, I ask for new versions of the errata documents (documents, schema, rddl, etc.) indicating the status “Approved Errata” and the date of approval (as noted in [1] – 7  January 2008). I then upload the documents to docs.oasis-open.org and add them to the OASIS Standards page listing.

 

The TC should also note the status and location on their public home page.

 

Some TCs also create a merged specification – that is, the OS version plus the errata changes – and that can also be uploaded and noted on the OASIS Standards page listing.

 

  Let me know if you need my help in pulling any of this together.

 

Regards,

 

Mary

 

 

From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:13 PM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; tom@coastin.com
Subject: Approved Errata for WS-RM specifications (of WS-RX TC)

 

 

Hi Mary,

The WS-RX TC has confirmed by a Full Majority Vote [1] the proposed corrections (that have been publicly reviewed in Dec 2007) as Approved Errata.

The TC thinks [2] that in order to formally publish the Approved Errata -
A> The links for the errata in the specification document should be provided with a page (pointing to the errata documents)

B> The TC home page should announce the publication of the Approved Errata

Besides the above, I think the RDDL documents for the RM specifications should also be updated to reflect the Approved Errata.

I am wondering if you have a pre-established list of actions (such as above) to be taken for formally publishing the Approved Errata.

Thanks,
Sanjay

 

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/ballot.php?id=1404
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200801/msg00004.html