From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: February 22, 2006 9:01 PM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: Anish Karmarkar; Gilbert Pilz;
wsrx
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] WSRM WD 10
and WSRMP WD 06 and related documents uploaded (candidates for CD 3)
Paul - thanks for noticing. I've added that fix
to the next WD - not big enough to regen the candidate CD.
-Doug
"Paul Cotton"
<Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
02/22/2006 01:48 PM
|
To
|
"Anish Karmarkar"
<Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Gilbert Pilz"
<Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>, Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
|
"wsrx"
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
|
RE: [ws-rx] WSRM WD 10 and WSRMP WD 06 and
related documents uploaded (candidates for CD 3)
|
|
>
3) WSRMP WD-06 PDF format:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16753/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-06.pdf
Line 163 contains the following text:
"Line (21) indicates that the policy in Line
(11-14) applies to this
binding, ..."
I believe we should change "Line (21)"
to "Line (19)".
/paulc
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17
Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar
[mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: February 18, 2006 4:12 PM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] WSRM WD 10 and WSRMP WD 06
and related documents
uploaded
> (candidates for CD 3)
>
> All,
>
> The editors have made the following documents
ready for review as
> promised. These documents should be
considered candidates for CD 3 (as
> we agreed on previous calls so as to make
stable docs available for
> interop). Please send
comments/corrections/etc to the list.
>
> 1) WSRM WD-10 PDF format:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16754/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf
>
> 2) WSRM WD-09/WD-10 Diff PDF format:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16756/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-09-10-diff.pdf
>
> 3) WSRMP WD-06 PDF format:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16753/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-06.pdf
>
> 4) WSRMP WD-05/WD-06 Diff PDF format:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16755/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-05-06-diff.pdf
>
> 5) WSRM Schema 200602:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16741/wsrm-1.1-schema-200602.xsd
>
> 6) WSRM Schema 200510/200602 Diff (diff -w):
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16748/wsrm-1.1-schema-200510-200602.dif
>
> 7) WSRM WSDL 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16742/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200602.wsdl
>
> 8) WSRM WSDL 200510/200602 Diff (diff -w):
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16749/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-200602.dif
>
> 9) WSRMP Schema 200602:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16743/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200602.xsd
>
> 10) WSRMP Schema 200510/200602 Diff (diff
-2):
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
>
editors/download.php/16750/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200510-200602.dif
>
>
> Please note that the editors have made three
non-editorial changes
that
> were **not** authorized by the TC (as part of
the issue resolutions),
> but follow from the context of the resolution
or are bug fixes.
>
> 1) In the resolution of issue i078, the WSDL
changes that were
approved
> made TerminateSequence and
TerminateSequenceResponse two separate
> operations. Clearly, they are meant to be a
single operation similar
to
> CloseSequence/CloseSequenceResponse (that was
one of the points of
issue
> i078). We assumed that this was indeed the
intention and went ahead
with
> the fix.
> 2) In the proposal for i087, the attribute
extensibility was missing
> from the description, but was present in the
pseudo-schema (with a
> malformed syntax). Since the other text in
the proposal essentially
said
> migrate the element from WSRMP spec to WSRM
and the element in WSRMP
> spec had the attribute extensibility, it was
added to the spec.
> 3) A new fault code wsrm:SequenceClosed was
added to the WSRM schema
> (this was a mismatch between the existing
spec and schema)
>
> Chairs: can we get this on next week's agenda
so that the TC can
ratify
> this (or not). Of course if the TC does not
agree with these fixes,
the
> editors will pull them out.
>
> Also note that the resolution of issue 83 has
not been incorporated
> (requires going through the whole spec and
changing wordings around
> possibly every RFC 2119 keyword). This will
be done for the subsequent
> draft.
>
> -WSRM editorial team
> --