Re: [ws-rx] i119 - discussion of ballot

[Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM>]

Doug,

I'm assuming the sequence state should be available to all ultimate 
recipients within the RMS cluster.  This is very different from 
requiring all to be able to pass messages to all AS.

On 22/05/06 09:50, Doug Davis wrote:
> If I understand your 'uncoordinated' comment correctly, you're saying 
> that a
> gateway should know how to route the message, right?  But if the Body is
kind of
> intended for backend#1 and the Ack is intended for backend#2 how would
> that work? Or are you suggesting that the gateway should split the msg 
> into
either backend should be able to update the shared state
> pieces and send each part to the correct backend machine? Or are you
that's another, more complex way to do it; prevents load-balancing of 
acknowledgement processing however
> requiring that the gateway machine understand all possible RM states
> for all backend machines?
I hope not

thanx,
    doug
> thanks,
> -Doug