Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Editorial, Sec 3.3 fault response toTerminateSequenceRequest is not specified.

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

+1

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
wrote on 06/26/2006 01:16:50 PM:

> Ref wd15
> Section 3.3 states in its last paragraph on line
548:
>  
> On receipt of a TerminateSequence message an
RM Destination MUST 
> respond with a corresponding
> TerminateSequenceResponse message or generate
a fault.
>  
> The fault that can be alternatively generated
is not specified.
>  
> Proposal:
>  
> New Text:
>  
> On receipt of a TerminateSequence message an
RM Destination MUST 
> respond with a corresponding
> TerminateSequenceResponse message or generate
a UnknownSequenceFault
> if the Sequence is not known.
>  
> State Table Impact:
>  
> I assumed this to be the case in the state tables
submitted earlier today.
>  
>