Re: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Do sp:Header assertions in Signed/EncryptedParts,enforce the presense of those headers

[Ruchith Fernando <ruchith@wso2.com>]

I'd like to withdraw this issue!

The spec is clear about the behaviour that I wanted a clarification for [1].

Thanks,
Ruchith

[1]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02.html#_Toc161826512

Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSION THREAD UNTIL THE
> ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> 
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
> 
> 
> Protocol:  ws-securitypolicy
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/22786/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-02-r3.pdf
> 
> 
> Artifact:  spec / schema
> 
> 
> Type: clarification
> 
> 
> Title: Do sp:Header assertions in Signed/EncryptedParts, enforce the
> presence of those headers
> 
> Description:
> 
> When we specify sp:Header elements in sp:SignedParts or
> sp:EncryptedParts, is it correct to enforce the pretense of *all* those
> headers in the SOAP msg and throw a fault if any one of the the headers
> are missing?
> 
> If so, do we have (or is it possible to have) some mechanism to specify
> headers to be signed only if they are present?
> 
> Related issues:
> 
> None.
> 
> 
> Proposed Resolution:

OpenPGP digital signature