RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 - Issue 23 Resolution

["Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

Short Answer: Yes

Long Answer: A good question. I have a bunch of edits I need to make over
the coming week in order to fully explain multi-start but it seems silly to
hold on to the pen. I will make the edits off-line and then edit them back
in to whatever version exists when I finish. I don't expect the sections I'm
editing to radically change in the next week or two so I'm not too worried
about the effort needed to do a manual merge.

		Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:56 PM
> To: ygoland@bea.com; Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group
> (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 -
> Issue 23 Resolution
> 
> 
> Thanks.  Are you handing the pen back?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] 
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:16 PM
> To: Satish Thatte; 'Kartha, Neelakantan'; 'BPEL Spec Editing Group
> (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 -
> Issue 23 Resolution
> 
> Done.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:07 PM
> > To: Kartha, Neelakantan; BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 -
> > Issue 23 Resolution
> > 
> > 
> > I would add "properly configured" in the following way
> >  
> >  
> > The set of structured activities in BPEL4WS is not intended 
> to be the
> > minimal required set. There are cases where one activity can replace
> > another. For example, the sequence activity, used to 
> > structure sequential
> > processing, may be emulated by a properly configured  flow 
> > with additional links. The purpose in
> > providing what are, strictly speaking, redundant activities 
> > is to make it
> > easier for BPEL programmers to both read and write BPEL 
> > programs by making
> > available familiar, if functionally redundant, programming 
> constructs.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > The reason is to highlight that in cases where a sequence has 
> > additional links coming into it, getting the behavior to be 
> > eqwuivalent with a flow can be tricky.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Satish
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: Kartha, Neelakantan [mailto:N_Kartha@stercomm.com]
> > Sent: Thu 10/23/2003 12:39 PM
> > To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 
> > 0.6 - Issue 23 Resolution
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Looks good to me.
> > 
> > Kartha
> > 
> > (BTW, sorry I could not make it yesterday--was traveling on 
> business).
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yaron Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:00 PM
> > To: BPEL Spec Editing Group (E-mail)
> > Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Proposed Language for Version 0.6 
> > - Issue 23
> > Resolution
> > 
> > 
> > In playing around with Issue 23 I felt it could use a bit 
> of editorial
> > cleanup. I used the exact text from the resolution in the 
> > exact position
> > specified. My only change to the issue's text was the 
> > addition of a comma
> > and the removal of the last part of the last sentence. 
> These are just
> > editorial changes.
> > 
> > I also added an additional sentence which, while 
> > non-normative, I felt would
> > make the whole situation a lot clearer.
> > 
> > The set of structured activities in BPEL4WS is not intended 
> to be the
> > minimal required set. There are cases where one activity can replace
> > another. For example, the sequence activity, used to 
> > structure sequential
> > processing, may be emulated by a flow with additional links. 
> > The purpose in
> > providing what are, strictly speaking, redundant activities 
> > is to make it
> > easier for BPEL programmers to both read and write BPEL 
> > programs by making
> > available familiar, if functionally redundant, programming 
> constructs.
> > 
> >         Any comments before I check this in?
> > 
> >                 Thanks,
> >                                 Yaron
> > 
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> > the roster of the
> > OASIS TC), go to
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/
> members/leave_
> workgroup.php.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> the roster of
> the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/
members/le
ave_workgroup.php.




To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/le
ave_workgroup.php.



To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/members/leave_
workgroup.php.

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>