[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today
I seem to be confused. My calendar claims the editor calls are on Wednesdays at 9:30 am. Did the world change? Alex Yiu wrote: > Hi, all, > > Just finished the conf call, I will grab the pen after Kevin, Prasad and Kartha > ... > to fix a number of issues in both main spec and XSD which are discovered right > before the Dec F2F > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Alex Yiu > > > Satish Thatte wrote: > >>Wow; this will be a short call :-) Current volunteers >> >>Kevin: 145, 155, 171 >> >>Prasad: 162, 167 >> >>Kartha: 170 >> >>I would like to spend a few minutes to revisit 170 just so I am clear on >>it. Tried to look at WSDL for a few minutes this morning and things >>were not obvious to me there. >> >>Satish >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:41 AM >>To: Liu, Kevin; Satish Thatte; bpel spec >>Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today >> >>If no other volunteers, I can also work on 145, and 171. This should >>take care all the issues in the short list(Since Kartha is already >>working on 170, and Prasad on 162, 167.) >> >>Best Regards, >>Kevin >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] >>>Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 08:31 AM >>>To: Satish Thatte; bpel spec >>>Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today >>> >>> >>>I can take 155. >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>Kevin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] >>>>Sent: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 07:54 AM >>>>To: bpel spec >>>>Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] issues for discussion today >>>> >>>> >>>>Issue 145 Properties on Non-Message Variables 16 Dec 2004 >>>>Issue 155 complexType Variables 9 Dec 2004 >>>>Issue 162 Unique Activity Names for Compensate 15 Dec 2004 >>>>Issue 167 Rethrow semantics clarification 27 Oct 2004 >>>>Issue 170 How to handle faultcode, faultstring, and faultactor 3 Dec >>>>2004 >>>>Issue 171 faultName should be optional for invoke fault >>>> >>>> >>>handlers 15 Dec >>> >>> >>>>2004 >>>> >>>>This is the "to be incorporated" list Peter has (leaving out the >>>>perennial stragglers), and I believe it correctly reflects >>>> >>>> >>>the next set >>> >>> >>>>of changes. Let us discuss how to get them in today. >>>> >>>>Satish >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]