RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed

["Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>]

Editors,

I've just updated the "Resolved issues awaiting editing" table - I've
left 111.1 as awaiting, since the schema isn't done yet, but marked 93
as done.

Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: 12 April 2005 18:21
> To: Francisco Curbera; bpel spec
> Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Assaf Arkin
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
> 
> 
> Dear Editors,
> 
> After Paco is done, I suggest the following assignments
> 
> Alex:  102, 103, 111.1 (XSD) 
> 
> Assaf: 29, 81, 160
> 
> Satish: 86, 130, 139, 186
> 
> Yaron: 132, 136, 154
> 
> Passing the pen in that order.  I believe Alex and Assaf are 
> up and running with SourceForge.  Alex needs to finish the 
> XSD work on 111.1 which Paco has completed in the text.  
> Yaron and I are not yet up with SourceForge, so this lets us 
> procrastinate a bit more.  Putting Yaron last to give him 
> time to hit us with the 22 additional issues he is working on :-)
> 
> Let me know if this is acceptable.
> 
> We still have 126, 140 and 163 open for other editors to 
> volunteer for.
> 
> Satish
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Thatte 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:09 AM
> To: 'Francisco Curbera'; bpel spec
> Cc: 'ygoland@bea.com'
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
> 
> Yaron and Paco need to sync up and tell us the status of 93 
> and 112. Paco still has the pen.  More mail on issues will follow.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:10 PM
> To: bpel spec
> Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] updated spec committed
> 
> I took the job of applying the following issue resolutions: 
> 12.1, 93, 111.1 and 112.
> 
> - 12.1 had already been applied (in fact I had already done 
> so a month ago
> - we need to update the "Resolved issues awaiting editing 
> into spec" table).
> 
> - 93 has been applied to the spec AND the wsbpel_main.xsd 
> schema. Note that the last text change for section 13.4 was 
> defined in the resolution terms of the pre-12.1 text; the 
> post-12.1 text already incorporates an equivalent change - 
> Yaron, can you please check?
> 
> - 111.1 has been applied to the spec, but I agreed to work 
> with Alex on the schema; I believe Alex will be taking a 
> first pass at updating wsbpel_main.xsd once he get the pen.
> 
> - 112 - I am a bit unsure about what is the final resolution 
> for this one; Yaron's resolution was amended (by me and 
> Danny) to use the form
> 
> <toPart part="ncname" fromVariable="ncname"/>
> 
> and to not require a precise ordering of parts; I am not sure 
> if this amendments apply as well to the <fromPart...> spec, 
> or the <fromPart...> spec was left as in the original 
> proposal. The minutes do not seem to say anything so I would 
> appreciate everyone's help in reconstructing what exactly was 
> decided (Yaron as the sponsor of the resolution probably 
> remembers better than me) - then I will dutifully apply it to 
> the spec.
> 
> So I am keeping the pen for now, pending some clarification on 112.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paco
> 
> 
>