wsbpel-spec-edit message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] compensation handling issue resolutions (207, 207.1, 216, 217, 226, 229)
- From: Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>
- To: Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:07:46 -0700
Thanks Dieter.
From my notes - Alex is next to update
the xsd for these issues and when Alex completes, Danny will do issue 195
and action items 9 and 14.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
02/21/2006 01:45 AM
|
To
| Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] compensation
handling issue resolutions (207, 207.1, 216, 217, 226, 229)Link |
|
Hi Diane, I applied the compensation handling issue
resolutions (207, 207.1, 216, 217, 226, 229), and checked-in version 1.110.
Please pass the pen to the next spec editor (sorry,
I don't remember who is next).
Notes to the spec-editing team:
(0) When I tried to check in the new version, I made
a couple of CVS user errors. Hopefully nothing is damaged - I will make
sure this does not happen the next time. Just in case, I attached the new
version of the spec to this note -- also attached the two new pictures
(not yet checked in).
(1) Issue resolution 217 (new activity "compensateScope")
did not provide specific spec text - I therefore changed text in many places
where we just had "compensate" in the past. At the start of 12.3.3
("Invoking a Compensation Handler"), I also moved a few paragraphs
up/down in order to fit with the generic introduction and the specific
sections for each compensate activity ("compensateScope" and
"compensate").
(2) I slightly modified the heading structure under
12.3.3 ("Invoking a Compensation Handler") because compensation
of scopes nested in event handlers was under "Compensation for Scopes
in Repeatable Constructs". This was followed by "Compensation
within Handlers" which does not consider event handlers. The result
is a compromise between Alex' and my earlier proposals:
12.3.3. Invoking a Compensation Handler
12.3.3.1. Compensation of a Specific
Scope
12.3.3.1. Default Compensation Behavior
12.3.4. Compensation within Repeatable Constructs
or Handlers
12.3.4.1. Compensation Handler Instance
Groups
12.3.4.2. Compensation within Repeatable
Constructs
12.3.4.3. Compensation within Fault
Handlers
12.3.4.4. Compensation within Compensation
Handlers
12.3.4.5. Compensation within Termination
Handlers
Kind Regards
DK
1.110 - wsbpel-specification-draft.doc
compensation-within-handlers.ppt
compensation-within-fault-handler.jpg
compensation-within-compensation-handler.jpg
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]