[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
Let us not start putting in things and then start looking for use cases for them -- one can always invent a use case for any feature :-) If compelling use cases exist they should come to us first! I propose that the proposal should be modified to eliminate rename. I agree that delete is needed for optional elements. Satish -----Original Message----- From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:50 AM To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down satish - this is probably a bit of feature creep. i was looking for examples of syntax to model after, and came across a nascent standard called XUpdate (http://www.xmldb.org/xupdate/). i took everything that appeared remotely useful. in my initial version, i stated that rename and delete were questionable. i think we need delete, but i'm less sure about rename. i don't have a use case for it in mind, but maybe someone else does. if not, i'm happy for it to be removed from the proposal. danny ----- Original Message ----- From: "Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> To: "Danny van der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com>; <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:26 PM Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down Danny, What was the motivation for the "rename" variant? All the others seem to be structural, and oriented towards handling optional and repeating elements, which I thought was the original issue. Satish -----Original Message----- From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:15 AM To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down In today's conference call, we limited the scope of issue 11 to exclude adding any new external dependencies. Previously, of the 2 outstanding proposals, I think the consensus was leaning more towards my proposal. I propose that anyone who cares to refine my original proposal, or take the discussion elsewhere please do so. The goal is to have a strawman votable proposal on the table at the F2F and then go from there. Here, for your convenience, is a link to my original proposal. danny http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200308/msg00157.html To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr oup.php. To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr oup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]