[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
Ugo, Ugo Corda wrote: What, exactly is the relationship between an operation defined in a port type, and that operation as bound to a particular protocol? Is this why you are concerned about relying on port types for our message descriptions? WSDL 1.1, Section 2.5: "A binding defines message format and protocol details for operations and messages defined by a particular portType."This clearly separates the layers. I don't see any mention of "extra" abstract messages becoming part of the abstract endpoint type. Microsoft has a nice article on the MSDN site that includes a diagram that illustrates this nicely. Perhaps we a suffering from terminology differences here. Can you provide us with a definition of an abstract endpoint using WSDL terminology? I hold that an abstract endpoint is defined by the port type (or interface, if you prefer WSDL 2.0 terminology). Cheers, -Ron |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]