[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]
I think the original intent was that a Consumer may add property validation constraints to those specified by the Producer (likely a 'republish' requirement). Suggest: R414 [Functionality] The Consumer SHOULD adhere to whatever property validation constraints the Producer has specified. The Consumer MAY specify additional property validation constraints. Eilon Reshef <eilon.reshef@webc To: "'Alan Kropp'" <akropp@epicentric.com>, ollage.com> wsia@lists.oasis-open.org cc: 05/04/2002 06:24 Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414] PM I agree (except that I would change must to should...). -----Original Message----- From: Alan Kropp [mailto:akropp@epicentric.com] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:10 PM To: 'wsia@lists.oasis-open.org' Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414] R414 [Functionality?] The Consumer should have a means to override property validation constraints and logic at each of its levels. Well, the Consumer could certainly do this, but the Producer is likely to reject such overriden values as invalid! I think the Consumer must be bound by whatever property validation schema the Producer enforces: R414 [Functionality] The Consumer must adhere to whatever property validation constraints the Producer may specify for any of its properties. ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC