RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

I agree, but the difference is whether it is good practice for the Consumer
to observe the Producer's types and constraints (eliminate round trips that
are guaranteed to fail) or whether a Consumer must run validation in order
to conform to the specification. I think we mean the former ....


                                                                                                                 
                      Alan Kropp                                                                                 
                      <akropp@epicentri        To:       Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,                         
                      c.com>                    wsia@lists.oasis-open.org                                        
                                               cc:                                                               
                      05/06/2002 12:50         Subject:  RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]                     
                      PM                                                                                         
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 



I'm a little uncomfortable with suggesting to the Consumer that it is
possible for them to ignore Producer validation constraints.
Operationally,
this cannot be expected to lead to good QOS.

I completely agree that the Consumer MAY specify additional validation
constraints.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 5:01 AM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]



I think the original intent was that a Consumer may add property validation
constraints to those specified by the Producer (likely a 'republish'
requirement). Suggest:


      R414 [Functionality]
              The Consumer SHOULD adhere to whatever property validation
      constraints the Producer has specified. The Consumer MAY specify
      additional property validation constraints.







                      Eilon Reshef

                      <eilon.reshef@webc        To:       "'Alan Kropp'"
<akropp@epicentric.com>,
                      ollage.com>                wsia@lists.oasis-open.org

                                                cc:

                      05/04/2002 06:24          Subject:  RE:
[wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]
                      PM








I agree (except that I would change must to should...).
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Alan Kropp [mailto:akropp@epicentric.com]
      Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:10 PM
      To: 'wsia@lists.oasis-open.org'
      Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]



      R414 [Functionality?]
                      The Consumer should have a means to override property

      validation constraints and logic at each of its levels.


      Well, the Consumer could certainly do this, but the Producer is
      likely to
      reject such overriden values as invalid!  I think the Consumer must
      be bound
      by whatever property validation schema the Producer enforces:


      R414 [Functionality]
                      The Consumer must adhere to whatever property
      validation
      constraints the Producer may specify for any of its properties.





      ----------------------------------------------------------------
      To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
      manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>









----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>