Subject: Re: [wsrm] [REL-14] WSDL for WSRM: extensibility elements?
> We should write and send a liaison to w3c wsdl group about this one. > > This is much wider than just for wsrm, and maybe they have some ideas on it. > > would anyone like to craft a liaison contribution to send to them with > our questions and concerns > about wsdl and soap extensions, in general? > > Tom Rutt > I like the idea of sending a liaison to w3c wsdl group. They may give us some advices for the solution of this issue. Before discussing this possibility I would like to suggest a solution which has not been considered yet : exploiting the WSDL extensibility features. I have not thourogly investigated the solution at the moment, but I would like to hear some ideas/comments from you about the possibility of defining proprietary (actually standardized) elements to be added, for example, in the WSDL binding element, such in a way that current WSDL docs could be extended to include ws-rm related information. Best Regards, Paolo Romano PS May be I should be posting WSDL related mails on the apposite wsdl sub-list, please let me know if you prefer me to do so. -- Paolo Romano