[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [wsrp-interfaces] Re: [wsrp-markup] Handling of attachments and/orlarge markup responses
Mike - yes, in terms of performance it would make sense to transfer the content and/or resources in a more efficient way than embedding it in the SOAP body. Nevertheless we will still need to encode/decode them in one or the other way. The main problem I see here is the lack of a standard that is currently widely implemented on the J2EE and .NET side. That's why I anted to ask the group if they think that SOAP attachments of DIME will be the standard to concentrate on. Best regards Carsten Leue ------- Dr. Carsten Leue Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401 |---------+-----------------------------> | | Michael Freedman | | | <Michael.Freedman@| | | oracle.com> | | | | | | 07/24/2002 02:01 | | | AM | |---------+-----------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: interfaces <wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org> | | cc: WSRP-Markup <wsrp-markup@lists.oasis-open.org> | | Subject: Re: [wsrp-markup] Handling of attachments and/or large markup responses | | | | | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Carsten, Besides the size issue you raise isn't there also a raw performance issue (regardless of size)? I.e. soap attachments mean we don't have to marshal/unmarshal (and potentially decode) any content hence performs best? If so, shouldn't we be considering requiring the use of soap attachments for transferring all content from getmarkup? -Mike- Carsten Leue wrote: > I would like to open a discussion thread on the handling of attachments and > (possibly large) markup responses in WSRP. > In some cases it will be necessary to transport large amounts of data in > the context of a WSRP SOAP request. This occurs when > - uploading a file (currently part of the request context) > - returning markup (currently the markup is just a string. In some cases > this might become large (e.g. > 100KB)) > - retuning state from the producer to the consumer > > encoding such large data blobs in SOAP message may pose problems, at least > in SOAP4J ist seems as if it was not possible to transfer more than 50KB in > a SOAP message. > I would propose that we define the transfer of blobs like the file upload > via an attachment mechanism. The two standards that are of interest are > SOAP-Attachments (http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-attachments) > DIME > ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/understanding/gxa/default.asp?pull=/library/en-us/dnglobspec/html/dimeindex.asp ) > > The latter seems to be the most interoperable one. What is the opinion of > the comittee? > > If we agree on using attachments then we could allow this also as an option > for embedding resources (images, etc) in the returned markup in addition to > letting the consumer proxy these resources or embedding a direct link. Any > opinions on this? > > Best regards > Carsten Leue > > ------- > Dr. Carsten Leue > Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany > Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC