[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-markup] [wsrp][markup] Minutes for 7/10/02 conference call
Chris,
To answer your question: This seems like something the interfaces subcommittee will need to decide. If you guys decide that this is a required part of the protocol then the url rewriting will have to incorporate some kind of mechanism to indicate to the consumer what path to take. Has this been discussed in the interface subcommittee yet?We discussed this today. The summary is that we are fine in supporting the semantics defined by the JSR. Namely [excerpted from Alejandro's message]: There are two types of URLs, action URLs and URLs with no action. AnRich/Carsten will include in a future draft. As they specify the details they will get back to us if issues/questions arise. -Mike- Chris Braun wrote: Mike, Well the sad thing is that I can't explain it, I have to admit I was a bit confused on the call. The more that I think about it, it seems that in order to incorporate this functionality the WSRP interface protocol would need to allow for this. The consumer would probably need to determine weather the action should be sent to the producer or simply a getMarkup call along with the parameters. This seems like something the interfaces subcomittee will need to decide. If you guys decide that this is a required part of the protocol then the url rewriting will have to incorporate some kind of mechanism to indicate to the consumer what path to take. Has this been discussed in the interface subcommittee yet? Chris |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC