wsrp-pfb message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] publishing a categorization scheme
- From: "Von Riegen, Claus" <claus.von.riegen@sap.com>
- To: Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>, wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:06:32 +0100
Title: Message
Hi
Andre,
Enabling new categorization systems is a two-step
process:
1. A
new tModel, categorized with the keyValue "categorization" of the UDDI Types
category system, is saved to the UDDI registry by using the save_tModel
API.
2. The
new tModel is referenced (by using its tModelKey) in a keyedReference within a
categoryBag of a UDDI entity (businessEntity, businessService, bindingTemplate,
or tModel) when saved with a save_xx API call. The keyedReference's keyValue,
i.e. the distinct category, is mandatory in this context and must not be
empty.
This
is normative UDDI V2/V3 behavior and must be supported in all implementations.
Whether or not it is additionally supported in corresponding UIs is not
mandated by the UDDI specification. The specification only covers programmatic
access by use of Web services.
Does
this answer your question?
Claus
As we discussed on the call today again, it has been
proposed we use categorization tModels for publishing as this would make certain
UDDI searches possible.
We want to make sure that the main UDDI
implementations allow adding a new categorization scheme without administrator
intervention. [We know we can't do it using the Web UIs for some
registries.]
The best way to check this would be to write a UDDI
client that adds such a tModel (and we should do this) but could the SAP &
IBM UDDI experts confirm that anyone with general publishing rights (add
business entity or business service) can add categorization schemes?
Common registry implementations: IBM, SAP, Microsoft,
Systinet WASP UDDI, ...
regards,
Andre
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]