OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [wsrp] [change request #250] Only 1 performBlockingInteraction()?

The current wording does not restrict ourselves for the future, in the future we could say it could be more than one and it would not break backwards compatibility.


Rich Thompson wrote:

Document: Spec
Section: 6.3.2
Page/Line: 44/28
Requested by: Michael Freedman
Old text: The Consumer MUST initiate at most one performBlockingInteraction() for any one client request.
New text: remove this newly added line

Reasoning:  Do we really want to restrict ourselves by this for the future?  As we haven't addressed events yet, should we be cautious to not handtie us if we find a use case/rationale that through handling of events would cause another blocking action to be called?  What is the harm of NOT limiting ourselves.  As long as each adheres to blocking rule it would seem safe.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]