wsrp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is metadata needed to indicate support forgetResource?
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:50:55 -0500
Is metadata required to say the caller
is a v1 Consumer? I would expect a Producer which supports both v1 and
v2 to know this is a v1 Consumer because the invocation came on the binding
to the v1 portType.
Another possible reason for Consumer
metadata would be if a v2 Consumer had the option of not supporting urls
causing getResource to be invoked. We have in general steered away from
such things in order to keep complexity down for the Producer and I would
rather we require v2 Consumers provide this support than require v2 Producers
to adapt.
Rich
Michael Freedman <Michael.Freedman@oracle.com>
12/21/2004 12:54 PM
|
To
| wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is
metadata needed to indicate support for getResource? |
|
And vice-versa: so a producer can adapt to run in
a 1.0 consumer.
Rich Thompson wrote:
Issue # 29
Spec section:
SubCommittee: Interfaces
Owner: Andre
Description: Isn’t
metadata needed to tell a Consumer whether or not a Producer supports getResource
(or is it always supported if urls encode for it and Consumers never invoke
it unless a url has encoded wsrp-useOperation=true)?
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]