[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wss] [draft] OASIS WSS TC Minutes 2005-09-20 for comment and correction
Clarification for minutes, item #4 issue 334: Motion that was accepted was to adopt Frederick's email proposal [1] with the first item #4 in that proposal changed to the following text: "Tokens and elements that are defined in this specification and related profiles to use wsu:Id attributes SHOULD use wsu:Id. Elements to be signed MAY use xml:id or wsu:Id, and use of xml:id MAY be specified in profiles. All receivers MUST be able to identify XML elements carrying a wsu:Id attribute as representing an attribute of schema type ID and process it accordingly. All receivers MAY be able to identify XML elements with a xml:id attribute as representing an id attribute and process it accordingly. Senders SHOULD use wsu:Id and MAY use xml:id. Note that use of xml:id in conjunction with inclusive canonicalization may be inappropriate, as noted in [XMLID] and thus this combination SHOULD be avoided." [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/email/archives/ 200509/msg00069.html This reflects adoption of [1] with Tony's suggested change [2] modified to add "this combination" to the last sentence, and to remove "optionally" after the MAY in that proposal. [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/email/archives/ 200509/msg00077.html ----- Note that on the call it was suggested that "Alternatively, the xml:id attribute may be used." be changed to upper case MAY as "Alternatively, the xml:id attribute MAY be used." I suggest we adopt this (editorial) change as well. ----- end minutes update ----- These changes would result in the following updated set of changes: Line numbers below refer to latest draft which is public review with subsequent committee changes [3] Add to section 4, ID References, (1) Replace "attribute" at line 494 with "attribute and the xml:id attribute [XMLID]." XMLID is a reference to the W3C XML ID Recommendation, to be added to the references section of the document. (2) Replace "are considered" with "are considered (in no particular order):" at line 495 (3) Add additional bullet after line 500: * Global xml:id attributes on elements (4) Add following paragraph right before 4.1, after line 504 Tokens and elements that are defined in this specification and related profiles to use wsu:Id attributes SHOULD use wsu:Id. Elements to be signed MAY use xml:id or wsu:Id, and use of xml:id MAY be specified in profiles. All receivers MUST be able to identify XML elements carrying a wsu:Id attribute as representing an attribute of schema type ID and process it accordingly. All receivers MAY be able to identify XML elements with a xml:id attribute as representing an id attribute and process it accordingly. Senders SHOULD use wsu:Id and MAY use xml:id. Note that use of xml:id in conjunction with inclusive canonicalization may be inappropriate, as noted in [XMLID] and thus this combination SHOULD be avoided. (5) Add following to end of last paragraph in 4.1, at line 521 Alternatively, the xml:id attribute MAY be used. Applications MUST NOT specify both a wsu:ID and xml:id attribute on a single element. It is an XML requirement that only one id attribute be specified on a single element. (6) Add reference to xml:id recommendation, section 16, after XMLENC [XMLID] W3C Recommmendation, “xml:id Version 1.0”, 9 September 2005. [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/ 13961/wss-v1.1-spec-draft-SOAPMessageSecurity-01.pdf Thanks. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:52 PM, ext Ron Williams wrote: > WSS-TC 9.20.2005 Bi-Weekly CC: > MINUTES Action > - [+] 1 Call to order/roll > call 9.20.05 9:10:13 AM > CDT > Minutes: Ron Williams, IBM > Roll Call: Don Flinn > 31 of 21 voting members required for quorum - quorum > achieved > > Discussion of OTP moving up on Agenda > 8:40 PDT scheduled for OTP (Chris Kaler) > - [+] 2 Reading/Approving minutes of last meeting (9.6) [1] > Minutes approved by unanimous consent > - [+] 3 Review of actions from prior meeting minutes > [1] 9.20.05 9:34:02 AM CDT > 9.06.01 - SAML Interop to archive Rich Levinsion has seen > it in the archive > *.02. - Monzillo and Gudge to take action to resolve > *.03. - Issue 405, 429, 430: No revised text (AN). > *.04 - Vijay - Open > *.05 - Frederick (msg 69) CLOSED > *.06 - List for public comments on 1.1 (Initial Draft) > CLOSED > *.07 - Tony - comments for 432 - CLOSED (432 pending review) > 8.23.04 - Text for 427 (Gudge) - > End of action items > - [+] 4 Issue list > review 9.20.05 > 9:34:31 AM CDT > 334 - XML ID - (Spirited Discussion) "Should" vs "May" > use xml:id vs WS:UID; Frederick's amendment w/ > Tony's addition/clarification. > Paul Cotton Motion: "This combination," eliminate > "optional," and fold into Frederick's Last - > Unanimous Consent? > Ron Monzillo Object's > Roll-Call Vote: Don Flinn > 13 yes, 4 no, 8 abstain - Motion Carries:9.20.05 10:10:12 > AM CDT > > 394 - for SAML Interop (closed in action items) > 406 - CLOSED > 408 - (fixed in draft 01) CLOSED > 409 - (fixed in ...) CLOSED > 410 - (U/P fixed) CLOSED > 411 - (Cored fixed in latest) CLOSED > 413 - (Value Attr fixed in latest Kerb Spec) CLOSED > 414 - (Pending Review -Clarify) CLOSED > 415 - (Fixed in latest) CLOSED > 416 - (URI for U/N Token - fixed in latest) CLOSED > 417 - (Serialize salt -fixed in latest) CLOSED > 418 - (Info field - fixed in latest) CLOSED > 420 - (X509 - thumb sha1 - fixed in latest) CLOSED > 421 - (X509 - min cert req's - fixed) CLOSED > 422 - (X509 - URI fixed) CLOSED > 423 - (X509 Value tyupe URI fixed) CLOSED > 424 - (X509 delete lines - fixed ) CLOSED > 425 - (Comment on SAML Token Profile - fixed) PENDING REVIEW > 426 - (fixed) CLOSED > end of pending > > OPEN Items: > 338 - No Change > 404 - No Objection to option 2 of gudges proposal. > Editors to make change, move to PENDING. (Tony: do > we need a new URI here?) Moved to PENDING > 427 - OPEN > 429 - Editorial: This is a intricately bound to 405. PENDING > 430 - Marked "Editorial" - Moved to PENDING REVIEW > 431 - X509 - Remains OPEN > 432 - Pending req's on core - moved to PENDING REVIEW > 433 - WSSE with WSSE 1.1 - moved to PENDING REVIEW > 434 - Schema Corrections in SAML Token Profile -update in > draft 7 posted last night, moved to PENDING > REVIEW > 435 - 435 and 431 are linked , resolution of one is > resolution of the other (Gudge) > 436 - to PENDING REVIEW > 437 - to PENDING REVIEW > 438 - Pub on SAML 1.1 - to PENDING REVIEW > 439 - Comment on Core 2009 ref'd but not cited: moved to > PENDING > 440 - Technical - msg 61 9.2005 Point this to msg 61 - OPEN > 441 - OPEN > 442 - CLOSED > 443 - Comment on WSU TImestamp Description: moved to > PENDING - Editors to Make Changes > - [+] 5 Public review status/outlook > Compiling list - Finished > - [+] 6 One Time Password Proposal [2] > Discussion - How much pertains to Authentication, and how > much to WSS? What needs to be the result, a > def of URI describing algo? > John - a profile functionally equivalent to other > authentication profiles. > Paul - believes OTP out of scope - msg sent to list. > Proposes a new TC by the proposers to do this > work. Discussion of Charter Amendment to expand scope to > encompass this proposal. > Paul: Extensibility Point > Kelvin - Agree to identify on what we're voting . . . > > Accept proposal as sub-committee to handle OTP. > Hans Moved to e-Vote on on proposal as stands, Ron > Williams (IBM) seconds the motion. > Objection - Tony wants discussion of sub-committee > issues. Motion does not Carry. > Discussion to start on the list. > > - [+] 7 Other business > Late Roll-Call > - [ ] 8 Adjournment > 9.20.05 11:09:05 AM CDT > > > <Minutes 9.20.05.opml> > > Cheers! > Ron Williams, IBM >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]