OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wss] [draft] OASIS WSS TC Minutes 2005-09-20 Rev 2 forcomment and correction


Attached is the individual vote tally for the vote taken on 2005-09-20.
See minutes for details.

Don

On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 18:57 -0500, Ron Williams wrote:
> Thanx to both Jeff (for point out the ambiguity) and Frederick (for  
> supplying the clarification) to issue 334, which has now been  
> incorporated into the minutes.
> 
> I do not have the individual votes for the tally of the issue. Don,  
> can you supply?
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> 
> WSS-TC 9.20.2005 Rev 2 Bi-Weekly CC:  
> MINUTES                              Action
> - [+] 1 Call to order/roll  
> call                                             9.20.05 9:10:13 AM CDT
>            Minutes: Ron Williams, IBM
>            Roll Call: Don Flinn (*attendance in appendix)
>            31 of 21 voting members required for quorum - quorum achieved
> 
>            Discussion of OTP moving up on Agenda
>            8:40 PDT scheduled for OTP (Chris Kaler)
> - [+] 2 Reading/Approving minutes of last meeting (9.6) [1]
>            Minutes approved by unanimous consent
> - [+] 3 Review of actions from prior meeting minutes  
> [1]                    9.20.05 9:34:02 AM CDT
>            9.06.01 - SAML Interop to archive Rich Levinsion has seen  
> it in the archive
>            *.02. - Monzillo and Gudge to take action to resolve
>            *.03. - Issue 405, 429, 430: No revised text (AN).
>            *.04 - Vijay - Open
>            *.05 - Frederick (msg 69) CLOSED
>            *.06 - List for public comments on 1.1 (Initial Draft) CLOSED
>            *.07 - Tony - comments for 432 - CLOSED (432 pending review)
>            8.23.04 - Text for 427 (Gudge) -
>            End of action items
> - [+] 4 Issue list  
> review                                                   9.20.05  
> 9:34:31 AM CDT
>            334 - XML ID - (Spirited Discussion) "Should" vs "May" use  
> xml:id vs WS:UID; Frederick's amendment w/
>            Tony's addition/clarification.
>            Paul Cotton Motion: "This combination," eliminate  
> "optional," and fold into Frederick's Last -
>            Unanimous Consent?
>                Ron Monzillo Object's
>            Roll-Call Vote: Don Flinn
>            13 yes, 4 no, 8 abstain - Motion Carries:9.20.05 10:10:12  
> AM CDT
> 
>            Clarification by Frederick Hirsch:
>            Clarification for minutes, item #4 issue 334:
> 
>            Motion that was accepted was to adopt Frederick's email  
> proposal [1]
>            with the first item #4 in that proposal changed to the  
> following text:
> 
>            "Tokens and elements that are defined in this  
> specification and
>            related profiles to use wsu:Id attributes SHOULD use  
> wsu:Id. Elements
>            to be signed MAY use xml:id or wsu:Id, and use of xml:id  
> MAY be
>            specified in profiles. All receivers MUST be able to  
> identify XML
>            elements carrying a wsu:Id attribute as representing an  
> attribute of
>            schema type ID and process it accordingly.
> 
>            All receivers MAY be able to identify XML elements with a  
> xml:id
>            attribute as
>            representing an id attribute and process it accordingly.  
> Senders
>            SHOULD use
>            wsu:Id and MAY use xml:id. Note that use of xml:id in  
> conjunction with
>            inclusive canonicalization may be inappropriate, as noted  
> in [XMLID]
>            and thus this combination
>            SHOULD be avoided."
> 
>            394 - for SAML Interop (closed in action items)
>            406 - CLOSED
>            408 - (fixed in draft 01) CLOSED
>            409 - (fixed in ...) CLOSED
>            410 - (U/P fixed) CLOSED
>            411 - (Cored fixed in latest) CLOSED
>            413 - (Value Attr fixed in latest Kerb Spec) CLOSED
>            414 - (Pending Review -Clarify) CLOSED
>            415 - (Fixed in latest) CLOSED
>            416 - (URI for U/N Token - fixed in latest) CLOSED
>            417 - (Serialize salt -fixed in latest) CLOSED
>            418 - (Info field - fixed in latest) CLOSED
>            420 - (X509 - thumb sha1 - fixed in latest) CLOSED
>            421 - (X509 - min cert req's - fixed) CLOSED
>            422 - (X509 - URI fixed) CLOSED
>            423 - (X509 Value tyupe URI fixed) CLOSED
>            424 - (X509 delete lines - fixed ) CLOSED
>            425 - (Comment on SAML Token Profile - fixed) PENDING REVIEW
>            426 - (fixed) CLOSED
>            end of pending
> 
>            OPEN Items:
>            338 - No Change
>            404 - No Objection to option 2 of gudges proposal. Editors  
> to make change, move to PENDING. (Tony: do
>            we need a new URI here?) Moved to PENDING
>            427 - OPEN
>            429 - Editorial: This is a intricately bound to 405. PENDING
>            430 - Marked "Editorial" - Moved to PENDING REVIEW
>            431 - X509 - Remains OPEN
>            432 - Pending req's on core - moved to PENDING REVIEW
>            433 - WSSE with WSSE 1.1 - moved to PENDING REVIEW
>            434 - Schema Corrections in SAML Token Profile -update in  
> draft 7 posted last night, moved to PENDING
>            REVIEW
>            435 - 435 and 431 are linked , resolution of one is  
> resolution of the other (Gudge)
>            436 - to PENDING REVIEW
>            437 - to PENDING REVIEW
>            438 - Pub on SAML 1.1 - to PENDING REVIEW
>            439 - Comment on Core 2009 ref'd but not cited: moved to  
> PENDING
>            440 - Technical - msg 61 9.2005 Point this to msg 61 - OPEN
>            441 - OPEN
>            442 - CLOSED
>            443 - Comment on WSU TImestamp Description: moved to  
> PENDING - Editors to Make Changes
> - [+] 5 Public review status/outlook
>            Compiling list - Finished
> - [+] 6 One Time Password Proposal [2]
>            Discussion - How much pertains to Authentication, and how  
> much to WSS? What needs to be the result, a
>            def of URI describing algo?
>            John - a profile functionally equivalent to other  
> authentication profiles.
>            Paul - believes OTP out of scope - msg sent to list.  
> Proposes a new TC by the proposers to do this
>            work. Discussion of Charter Amendment to expand scope to  
> encompass this proposal.
>            Paul: Extensibility Point
>            Kelvin - Agree to identify on what we're voting . . .
> 
>            Accept proposal as sub-committee to handle OTP.
>            Hans Moved to e-Vote on on proposal as stands, Ron  
> Williams (IBM) seconds the motion.
>            Objection - Tony wants discussion of sub-committee issues.  
> Motion does not Carry.
>            Discussion to start on the list.
> 
> - [+] 7 Other business
>            Late Roll-Call
> - [+] 8 Adjournment
>            9.20.05 11:09:05 AM CDT
> - [+] 9 APPENDIX
>      - [+] Attendance
>                Attendance of Voting Members
> 
>                Maneesh        Sahu             Actional Corporation
>                Duane             Nickull        Adobe
>                Gene             Thurston        AmberPoint
>                Hal             Lockhart        BEA Systems, Inc.
>                Denis             Pilipchuk        BEA Systems, Inc.
>                Rich             Levinson        Computer Associates
>                Thomas        DeMartini        ContentGuard
>                Dana             Kaufman        Forum Systems, Inc.
>                Toshihiro          Nishimura        Fujitsu Limited
>                Kefeng        Chen             GeoTrust
>                Irving        Reid             Hewlett-Packard
>                Kojiro        Nakayama        Hitachi
>                Derek             Fu             IBM
>                Maryann        Hondo             IBM
>                Kelvin        Lawrence        IBM
>                Mike             McIntosh        IBM
>                Anthony        Nadalin        IBM
>                Ron             Williams        IBM
>                Don             Flinn             Individual
>                Paul             Cotton        Microsoft Corporation
>                Vijay             Gajjala         Microsoft Corporation
>                Martin        Gudgin        Microsoft Corporation
>                Chris             Kaler             Microsoft Corporation
>                Frederick         Hirsch        Nokia Corporation
>                Abbie             Barbir        Nortel
>                Vamsi             Motukuru        Oracle Corporation
>                Martijn        de Boer        SAP
>                Ben             Hammond        RSA Security
>                Rob             Philpott        RSA Security
>                Pete             Wenzel        SeeBeyond
>                Ronald        Monzillo        Sun Microsystems
>                Hans             Granqvist        VeriSign
>                John             Linn             RSA Security
> 
>                Members
> 
>                Jeff             Hodges        NeuStar, Inc.
>                Sam             Wei             Documentum
>                Steve             Anderson        BMC Software
>                Will              Raymond        Tibco
> 
>                Lost Voting Status after the 9/20/05 call
> 
>                Nataraj        Nagaratnam        IBM
>                Blake             Dournaee        Sarvega
> 
> 
> 

050920Vote.doc



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]