Re: [xacml] Proposed Process for Public Review

[Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.com>]

This seems workable to me. -Anne

On 9 October, Hal Lockhart writes: [xacml] Proposed Process for Public Review
 > Since we are hoping to conduct a public review, potentially starting as soon
 > as Monday, I propose the following process strawman. The key point is we
 > need a volunteer to be the review editor. My basic idea is to work comments
 > as they come in. I think we should be willing to make changes that:
 > 
 > - correct errors and omissions 
 > - clarify intent
 > - fix clearcut bugs
 > 
 > we should avoid changes that:
 > 
 > - add features
 > - create new functionality
 > - alter existing functionality
 > 
 > 
 > 1. Spec available on web page
 > 2. Public review announced in OASIS news and by special email to members and
 > announce lists? (whatever lists Karl suggests)
 > 3. document and announcements request comments to comment list 
 > 4. review editor takes comments 
 > 4a. breaks up multiple comment messages
 > 4b. posts to mail list with proposed disposition:
 >    no action - propose explaination or clarification
 >    correction - propose line changes
 >    deferred - explain why 
 > 5. Each week TC takes up and votes on dispositions
 > 6. At end of comment period
 > 6a. apply all changes
 > 6b. provide message back to each commentor on the disposition of their
 > comments
 > 6c. vote for committee spec of updated version
 > 
 > Presumably this would be followed by the submission to OASIS.
-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692