[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Minutes of XACML TC Meeting 26 June 2003
One minor correction: Bill's name is spelled "Parducci" Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@bea.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 6:58 PM > To: XACML TC > Subject: [xacml] Minutes of XACML TC Meeting 26 June 2003 > > > > > > > Hal: Accept minutes form 6/12 > Hal: no objections to the election of Bill Karduchi as co-chair > > Hal: Focus on what it takes to close 1.1 > Hal: Go through minutes of focus group of 6/19 > > Anne: walk through the minutes > > Anne: schema issue on URI Equality > Hal: Motion to Simon to change the schema to URI Equality > > errata3.10 > Tim: already covered in 5.32, no action needed > > errat3.11 > Hal: Motion to clarify section according to focus group > > errata 3.2 > type unification definition proposal (bill comment on June 20) > > Anne: new errta item on obligations > Hal: Motion o propose the following edit - Policy and policyset to be > treated the same in all policy combining algorithms > > Anne: xpath node match issue > Hal: motion to accept replace of second half of definition of xpath > expression > > Hal: What else is needed to wrap-up 1.1 > Anne: couple of items to wrap up > Anne: properties for combining algorithms and work item G are still open > Hal: any other items open ? > Anne: item 1A is still open > Anne: item C is still open > Steve: Item C was dropped, Mary 29th minuets > Anne: Item C was added back May30th > Hal: motion to accept text as documented May 30th > Steve: comment on override, these only guarantee order at the level the > combining, edit need to add > > Anne: Issue on putting obligations in rules, added complexity and you can > put the same obligations in policy > Michiharu: has issue with this as it does not add complexity, its > up to the > implementor as some folks will not implement obligations > Anne: it does add to the size to the schema, so should push off to 2.0 > > Michiharu: agree to push off to 2.0 > Hal: makes sense to create a 2.0 > Hal: Close D for 1.1 and open item for 2.0 > > Anne: E and H (Condition references) push off until 2.0 > > Anne: Still have F (properties) open > Anne: Still have G (addicting target in environment element) open > Ann: ongoing discussion for F > > Michiharu: Propse to deffer f to 2.0 > Michiharu: Propose to defer G to 2.0 > > Hal vote to comities spec in 2 weeks > Anne: vote on 1.0 errata document in 2 weeks > > Tim: when will the drafts be avail ? > Tim: how about by being of work day 7th > Anne: we would vote on the 10th > > Hal: motion to close call > > Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122 > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.p hp
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]