OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xacml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xacml] Minutes of XACML TC Meeting 26 June 2003


One minor correction: Bill's name is spelled "Parducci"

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@bea.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 6:58 PM
> To: XACML TC
> Subject: [xacml] Minutes of XACML TC Meeting 26 June 2003
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hal: Accept minutes form 6/12
> Hal: no objections to the election of Bill Karduchi as co-chair
>
> Hal: Focus on what it takes to close 1.1
> Hal: Go through minutes of focus group of 6/19
>
> Anne: walk through the minutes
>
> Anne: schema issue on URI Equality
> Hal: Motion to Simon to change the schema  to URI Equality
>
> errata3.10
> Tim:  already covered in 5.32, no action needed
>
> errat3.11
> Hal: Motion to clarify section according to focus group
>
> errata 3.2
> type unification definition proposal (bill comment on June 20)
>
> Anne: new errta item on obligations
> Hal: Motion o propose the following edit - Policy and policyset to be
> treated the same in all policy combining algorithms
>
> Anne: xpath node match issue
> Hal: motion to accept replace of second half of definition of xpath
> expression
>
> Hal: What else is needed to wrap-up 1.1
> Anne: couple of items to wrap up
> Anne: properties for combining algorithms and  work item G are still open
> Hal: any other items open ?
> Anne: item 1A is still open
> Anne: item C is still open
> Steve: Item C was dropped, Mary 29th minuets
> Anne: Item C was added back May30th
> Hal: motion to accept text  as documented May 30th
> Steve: comment on override, these only guarantee order at the level the
> combining, edit need to add
>
> Anne: Issue on putting obligations in rules, added complexity and you can
> put the same obligations in policy
> Michiharu: has issue with this as it does not add complexity, its
> up to the
> implementor as some folks will not implement obligations
> Anne: it does add to the size to the schema, so should push off to 2.0
>
> Michiharu: agree to push off to 2.0
> Hal: makes sense to create a 2.0
> Hal: Close D for 1.1 and open item for 2.0
>
> Anne: E and H (Condition references) push off until 2.0
>
> Anne: Still have F (properties) open
> Anne: Still have G (addicting target in environment element) open
> Ann: ongoing discussion for F
>
> Michiharu: Propse  to deffer f  to 2.0
> Michiharu: Propose to defer G to 2.0
>
> Hal vote to comities spec in 2 weeks
> Anne: vote on 1.0 errata document in 2 weeks
>
> Tim: when will the drafts be avail ?
> Tim: how about by being of work day 7th
> Anne: we would vote on the 10th
>
> Hal: motion to close call
>
> Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.p
hp




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]