Re: [xacml] all-of-any/any-of-all

[Bill Parducci <bparducci@gluecode.com>]

heck, i'm confused just reading the problem :o) my thinking is that if 
you and polar think it is confusing then others will too, so a proposal 
for alternate text would be of tangible value.

just my two cents...

b

Seth Proctor wrote:
> In a conversation over the weekend, I realized that the english text
> used in the specification for the all-of-any and any-of-all functions is
> at best confusing and at worst incorrect. Specifically, the problem is
> with the word "collectively" which implies that all values from the
> "all" bag must be evaluated against the same value from the "any" bag.
> I'm also not sure the description for using the and function (in
> all-of-any) or the or function (in any-of-all) is correct. I pinged
> Polar about this, and he (I think) agreed that the text could use some
> tweaking.
> 
> Would someone like to agree or disagree on this point? Is it just me?
> Can someone explain to me how the text about using and/or (the 5th
> sentence of the 2nd paragraph in both sections) makes sense? If anyone
> else agrees that this needs work then I'll propose some alternate text.
> 
> 
> seth