Re: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function

[Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM>]

On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Tim Moses wrote:

> Seth - I notice that we are unclear in Section 5.8.  We say that legal
> values for the matchId attribute are documented in Section A.3.  Well, 
> all
> functions are documented in Section A.3.  So, am I right in saying that
> legal values for matchId are documented in Sections A.3.1 (equality
> predicates) and A.3.13 (special match functions)?  All the best.  Tim.

Tim and I just discussed this at the start of our conference call. The 
right thing to do is to reference section 7.5, where we list all the 
valid match functions. Everyone agree?


seth