[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] XACML 2.0 errata and 3.0
Olivier DUBUISSON wrote: > Hi Erik, > > as one of those who was involved in the adoption of XACML 2.0 as ITU-T > Rec. X.1142, I have a preference to go back to referencing XPath and > XQuery now that they are approved as W3C Recommendations (on the > assumption that the use of XPath and XQuery in XACML is not deviating > from how they are standardizaed in W3C). > > If we copy text, we could have misalignment with the W3C Rec.s in the > future. > > BTW do you have any idea about when you plan to submit XACML 3.0 to > the ITU-T? I would also prefer to make references. Both for 3.0 and the 2.0 errata. BTW, I noticed that the copied text in the 2.0 errata (and the ITU-T text I presume) uses different namespaces and identifiers than the text which the XACML 2.0 OASIS standard refers to. This means that the ITU-T version is not entirely interoperable with the OASIS version. For 3.0 I suggest we stay backwards compatible with the OASIS version. (Which is what is going to happen if we make a reference, rather than a copy.) Regarding XACML 3.0 and ITU-T, I haven't even considered that yet. I'll be happy enough with making it an OASIS standard first. :-) Regards, Erik
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]