[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] XACML 2.0 errata and 3.0
I recommend referring to the now-approved XPath and XQuery standards. Referencing the standard means people can re-use standard implementations of the XPath and XQuery functions with confidence. It also makes our own specification simpler and less prone to introduced errors. Regards, Anne Erik Rissanen wrote: > All, > > For the next 3.0 core draft I was planning to incorporate all the 2.0 > errata. Most of it concerns the definition of some data types and > functions copied from xpath/xquery. > > The copying was made to accommodate ITU since xpath/xquery was not > approved at the time. Anne raised the issue earlier about going back to > referring to the xpath/xquery, rather than copying text, now that they > have been approved. > > What should I do it for the next 3.0 draft? Should I copy text like the > current 2.0 errata, or should I refer to the approved version of > xpath/xquery? > > What should I do for future 2.0 errata? Should I keep the copied text, > or should we revert back to referring to xpath/xquery? > > Regards, > Erik > -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]