Re: [xacml] XACML versions and ITU

[Bill Parducci <bill@parducci.net>]

Ray,

I think it is possible. My suggestion is to start with the Issues list we were working from (this is the latest version I was able to find, Erik may have something more recent):

http://markmail.org/search/?q=xacml%20issues%20list#query:xacml%20issues%20list%20from%3A%22Erik%20Rissanen%22%20list%3Aorg.oasis-open.lists.xacml%20order%3Adate-backward+page:7+mid:vjj4vwhxj4fmep4f+state:results

This document is not complete in that it only addresses individual issues (and not themes like delegation), but it does provide a summary of specific changes as well as a broad list of those issues that were not addressed/filtered out (and why). 

For a more thematic overview I would start with the agenda/minutes of the F2F sessions (Oct 05, Mar 07, Nov 09). The Oct 2005 minutes are filed nicely on the wiki: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xacml/Oct2005F2FAgenda :)

b


On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:45 PM, <remon.sinnema@emc.com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 6:30 PM
>> To: Sinnema, Remon; xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: RE: [xacml] XACML versions and ITU
>> 
>> In 2006, Approved Errata was added to the OASIS TC Process, but because
>> of the complexity of the changes simply mechanically generating the
>> differences between the documents would not produce anything readable.
>> What is need is for someone to sit down and figure out what the actual
>> changes are, not line by line, but in terms of individual consistent
>> modifications. Then we could have something we could vote on and
>> publicly review as specified by the TC Process.
> 
> Could someone who wasn't a TC member at the time these changes were introduced figure them out? For instance, by just going through the mailing list archives?
>