[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Validation state in XLIFF 2.0
Thanks Bryan, I missed that bottom line. I'll wait for Asgeir's input. Thanks -ys > -----Original Message----- > From: bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com] > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:18 AM > To: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xliff] Validation state in XLIFF 2.0 > > Hi Yves, > > I think you can go to this page http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking and find the > text at the bottom of the page that says 'To create a new Feature, please use the form below, and enter > a wiki-name such as "NameOfMyFeature" that identifies this feature. You will also need to edit this page > and include the feature under the relevant section.' This is the tool Asgeir built for adding XLIFF 2.0 > features for consideration. > > As we have informally identified Asgeir as the Wiki Gardener, it might be prudent to ask him to comment > on this procedure as well. > > By the way, I am also in favor of just using the state attribute to track status, and deprecating > "approved." > > Thanks, > > Bryan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@translate.com] > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 8:25 AM > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [xliff] Validation state in XLIFF 2.0 > > > Hi all, > > What is the process to follow to add possible features to 2.0? (not content-related) > > For example, I'd like the issue of the approved/state attribute to be solved. Should I just add an item > in the wiki? > > > Just a summary: > > Currently a trans-unit can have a approved attribute set to "yes' and the state attribute of the <target> > set to any value, > including some clearly indicating that the translation is not ready. This is contradictory. It seems > approved is just redundant for > state="final". > > In 1.2 in one place it says "The optional approved attribute indicates whether the translation has been > approved by a reviewer": > That is what the state attribute of <target> is for no? > > In another place it says "Approved - Indicates whether a translation is final or has passed its final > review." Is it final if the > final review is done? If so why saying both? If not, what approved='yes' then means? that it is final or > that the final review is > done. > > As XLIFF prime goal is to facilitate the exchange of data during a translation process, it is important > to have a clear and well > defined description of what are the expected behavior for the possible values of state and approved. I'm > testing several XLIFF > editor right now, and none of them do the same thing about setting state/approved: So it's almost > useless for our localization > process. > > Thanks, > -yves > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]